![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
"Ranking programs historically by strength of schedule" |
|
CONTEXT ADDED BY ADMIN: END OF CONTEXT Since everything fans beat their chests about….undefeated seasons, “national titles”, winning percentage, top tier bowls, etc is all affected by the strength of the opponents they play, let’s take a look at the top 20 teams in overall winning percentage and compare them. There are some huge differences in the toughness of the opponents different teams have played over the years.
Observations:
1) Notice who is most likely to hang an “L” on you even if you’re good. Now notice who is most widely recognized for having the most MNC’s/prestige. Notice anything? The teams most likely to beat good teams are the ones which are almost universally recognized for having the most MNC’s. That’s no coincidence.
2) Large differences between a team’s overall winning percentage and winning percentage vs good teams show who has benefitted from playing a weaker schedule….and who has been harmed by playing a tougher schedule. The Delta winning percentage particularly shows this….if there is a large delta it means that team has benefitted from playing weaker opponents
3) Pay particular attention to the percent of games against other top 20 opponents in overall winning percentage. This shows us how tough your schedules really were.
MICHIGAN Total Games played = 1232 Overall Winning percentage = 73.45% Rank = #1 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 208 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 56.25% Rank = #5 Delta Winning percentage = -17.20% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 16.88% Rank = #13 Conclusions: easy schedules. More than half of all games vs other top 20 programs have been vs Ohio State. Still, the delta in the winning percentage is moderate. They’re not an easy out historically
NOTRE DAME Total Games played = 1182 Overall Winning percentage = 73.27% Rank = #2 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 242 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 59.71% Rank = #1 Delta Winning percentage = -13.56% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 20.47% Rank = #11 Conclusion: moderate to easy schedules, but they do beat good teams at a very high rate slightly edging out Bama. As much crap as they catch for their schedules, others have been easier.
TEXAS Total Games played = 1212 Overall Winning percentage = 71.73% Rank = #3 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 196 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 57.91% Rank = #3 Delta Winning percentage = -13.82% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 16.17% Rank = #14 Conclusion: Their schedule has been cake but at least when they do play good teams they beat them at a pretty high rate.
OKLAHOMA Total Games played = 1169 Overall Winning percentage = 71.70% Rank = #4 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 240 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 46.67% Rank - #14 Delta Winning percentage = -25.03% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 29.53% Rank = #10 Conclusion: moderate to easy schedule and a very large difference in performance vs good teams and the rest.
OHIO STATE Total Games played = 1181 Overall Winning percentage = 71.59% Rank = #5 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 201 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 47.51% Rank = #13 Delta Winning percentage = -24.08% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 17.02% Rank = #12 Conclusions another very large difference in performance vs good teams and the rest. Easy schedules have again helped a lot.
ALABAMA Total Games played = 1164 Overall Winning percentage = 70.75% Rank = #6 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 430 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 59.42% Rank = #2 Delta Winning percentage = -11.33% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 36.94% Rank #2 Conclusion: Just extremely impressive. Very tough schedules overall and yet Alabama just beats good teams anyway. This is the 2nd most likely program to beat other good opponents and the gap between them and ND is very slight….but their schedules are significantly harder.
USC Total Games played = 1134 Overall Winning percentage = 70.50% Rank = #7 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 274 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 57.12% Rank = #4 Delta Winning percentage = -13.08% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 24.16% Rank = #9 Conclusions: Reasonably good schedules and they beat good teams at a good clip. They deserve their blue blood status.
NEBRASKA Total Games played = 1233 Overall Winning percentage = 70.13% Rank = #8 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 199 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 47.74% Rank = #13 Delta Winning percentage = -22.39% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 16.14% Rank = #15 Conclusions: Easy schedules overall have helped a lot and there is a large difference in performance vs good opponents and the rest.
TENNESSEE Total Games played = 1183 Overall Winning percentage = 68.99% Rank = #9 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 293 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 49.32% Rank = #7 Delta Winning percentage = -19.67% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 24.77% Rank = #8 Conclusions reasonably good schedules overall but they have struggled more often than their overall winning percentage would suggest when faced by better opponents.
PENN STATE Total Games played = 1219 Overall Winning percentage = 68.94% Rank = #10 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 134 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 48.51% Rank = #10 Delta Winning percentage = -20.43% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 10.99% Rank = #17 Conclusions simply put one of the easiest schedules of any top shelf program. They do not perform nearly as well against good teams.
fsu Total Games played = 712 Overall Winning percentage = 66.36% Rank = #11 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 223 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 48.65% Rank = #9 Delta Winning percentage = -17.71% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 31.32% Rank = #5 Conclusions Good schedules, definitely better than most. There is a moderate difference in how they perform against good opponents vs the rest.
GEORGIA Total Games played = 1188 Overall Winning percentage = 64.36% Rank = #12 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 379 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 48.15% Rank = #11 Delta Winning percentage = -16.21% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 31.90% Rank = #4 Conclusions definitely tough schedules. Only a moderate difference in how they perform against good opponents vs overall.
LSU Total Games played = 1157 Overall Winning percentage = 64.32% Rank = #13 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 305 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 44.10% Rank = #16 Delta Winning percentage = -20.22% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 26.36% Rank = #7 Conclusions: pretty good schedules but a fairly large difference in performance vs good opponents and the rest
miami Total Games played = 899 Overall Winning percentage = 63.35% Rank = #14 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 266 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 46.62% Rank = #15 Delta Winning percentage = -16.73% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 29.59% Rank = #6 Conclusions Tough schedule and a moderate difference in performance vs good teams and the rest
AUBURN Total Games played = 1157 Overall Winning percentage = 63.17% Rank = #15 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 422 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 48.93% Rank = #8 Delta Winning percentage = -14.24% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 36.47% Rank = #3 Conclusions Utterly brutal schedules. Brutal. Low delta vs how they perform against good opponents and the rest. This is a better program than many realize.
FLORIDA Total Games played = 1081 Overall Winning percentage = 63.09% Rank = #16 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 431 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 50.35% Rank = #6 Delta Winning percentage = -12.74% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 39.877% Rank = #1 Conclusions THE most brutal schedule in America and its not close – not even remotely close. One of the lowest delta’s in America between performance vs good teams and the rest.
WASHINGTON Total Games played = 1126 Overall Winning percentage = 61.33% Rank = #18 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 169 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 36.98% Rank = #18 Delta Winning percentage = -24.35% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 15.01% Rank #16 Conclusions easy schedules and a big difference in performance vs good opponents and everybody else.
ARIZONA STATE Total Games played = 931 Overall Winning percentage = 61.10% Rank = #17 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 81 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 37.04% Rank Delta Winning percentage = -24.06% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 8.70% Rank = #18 Conclusions ridiculously easy schedules and this program has not performed nearly as well when faced by tougher opponents
VA TECH Total Games played = 1156 Overall Winning percentage = 60.73% Rank = #20 Total Games vs historic top 20 = 92 Winning percentage vs historic top 20 = 36.96% Rank = #19 Delta Winning percentage = -23.77% Percent of games vs historic top 20 = 7.96% Rank #19 Conclusions: here we have it. THE easiest schedule of any program in the top 20 and a large difference in performance vs good teams vs everybody else.
Overall Conclusions :It’s a whole lot easier to avoid losing ballgames when you don’t play as many games against teams more likely to beat you. |
|
-- Starred by: IntimiGator JimG8R chigatorbri water lizard --
|

This site is independently owned and operated and is not affiliated in any official capacity with the University of Florida. |
||