Let me explain this for you. Please follow closely this time.

Questioning our ability to hire a good coach is DIFFERENT than saying that UF should not fire Muschamp.

Similarly, arguing that UF CAN hire a good coach is DIFFERENT than saying UF should fire Muschamp.

To support my position, I recall multiple posts from some (who I will not name) who stated that they were inclined to want Muschamp fired, but were concerned that we would not be able to hire a quality coach to replace him.

Furthermore, I can cite to one of Muschamp's biggest supporters on the board for arguing against the position that the school would struggle to find a quality replacement. The person I am referencing simply believed that UF already had the best man for the job.

==============================

sample of the VS denizens truly believe or believed that the reason they felt we shouldn't fire the coach is because the UF job has become so devalued that we wouldn't likely be able to attract an appropriate replacement.  Is that what you believe, and what you're saying here...really?

I firmly believe that those who urged caution were doing so out of an assessment of the unimpressive and very small field of qualified, attractive and available candidates at the time, nothing more.  And i don't think it's accurate, or fair, to (mis)represent those sentiments as being anything other than "Okay, who you got?"

If there really were more than just a couple of overbaked, likely sarcastic, "Woe is us!" sentiments about it being the case that our HC job has gotten devalued, well then i tip my cap to you. You're better at keeping score on the internet than i am.