...telling me that I have a "strawman" where none exists has nothing to do with the gallup poll. In essence you can't argue, or even discuss, the poll even when I posted a link to the poll itself. So what you do is what everyone on the right does when faced with anything you can't debate, you change the subject. So reducing the argument to an absurdity, and trying to argue the absurdity is the game you're playing. Have a great rest of the evening.

It explains itself..the incumbent almost ALWAYS is #1 in this poll. A 20% vote as "most admired " doesn't make up for a 49% disapproval rating . It is pretty meaningless.

You don 't have a clue what is "far right" or center. Your rants about Fox are meaningless now because you have shown your sources. The link you gave is not even liberal it is from the wacko wing of the far left

As for straw men...who here has argued claiming Fox News is not biased? Because that is what you keep alluding to. Who are you debating that with? A straw man argument is where you claim the other side is saying something then refute something they never said . That is exactly what you have done here...both in regards to Obama's perceived popularity by conservatives AND with your rants about Fox News. You are debating against positions nobody has taken. If you can't see that then it is pretty hopeless.