and Clinton did not. Comey made that distinction as the difference between Clinton and Petraeus as well.

==============================

she shouldn't. He simply said he could not prove it one way or another. That there wasn't "clear" evidence of that... That is BIG difference/distinction from what you just posted.

He didn't exhonerate her.

Based on Comey's testimony, Clinton is incompetant or unethical. Take your pick. She is one or the other.

But he NEVER said that she didn't intentionally/willfully do wrong... Just that they couldn't prove it one way or the other.

And he went out of his way to point out that if an ordinary shlub had done the same thing, while they wouldn't be charged criminally, they would likely be facing administrative consequences...meaning fired.

When Clinton does it though, we accept and even applaud her incompetance, and she will be getting promoted to commander in chief as a result of her incompetence. (Actually I don't think she is incompetant, I think she is unethical... )

I am actually shocked that you and other Dems have embraced the fact that she is incompetant, rather than she knew what she was doing.

What a #badword#ed up country we now live in.