though this is nothing new with the Clintons.  Despite some who claim it;s "old news", or that there has yet to be definitive evidence of quid-pro-quo, or even that it is all a VRWC, the fact remains that the arrangement was unseemly, unethical, and, once again, simply proves the claim that the Clinton's play by different rules from everyone else.

Hillary just "apologized" for using "one device" ....... yet this was not the issue, even though it was another thing about which she lied ..... among other things, it was about setting up a PRIVATE SERVER ......... a totally different matter which in no way was accidental.  When one looks at this entire mess, it becomes clear that the Clintons really did not care about appearances, except in that there were extraordinary measures taken to hide communications, delete e-mails, and keep the public in the dark.  Heck, even the current State Department is telling the AP and the people that they can't provide copies of her appointment calendar from over 4 years ago until AFTER the election.  

Further, she and Bill are now saying they are looking at ways to "transition" the foundation IF she is elected.  They should have done this, if they feel it is at all necessary & appropriate, when she became Secy. of State .... and at least when she decided to run for P0TUS ..... and leaving Chelsea on the Board of Directors hardly leaves us with reassuring optics, regardless the great things which may be done through their foundation.  And all of this is even without addressing the likely illegality of the situation.  They love anything which allows them to distract from their deeds.