When Donald Trump regularly makes threats to destroy all of humanity it is self-evident to any rationale person that those who allowed for his Presidency owe the rest of humanity an apology. 

I'm a flawed man, don't claim any moral high ground. However, there are guys on death row with enough moral compass to see this moral obvious - a megalomaniac who regularly threatens nuclear holocaust and legitimately has the ability to do so is a criminal against humanity. 

Oh it's just twitter. He's just like my crazy old conservative uncle. Sorry as much as we may become callous to his idiocy it's no laughing matter.

What if Putin were tweeting Nuclear threats at us? What would you say then?.... 

from anyone who voted third party. Again, who the hell are you to tell me that a 3rd party presidential vote in a deeply red state is a moral failing so great that I owe all of humanity an apology? Answer: You are not the person to demand that apology. Which is why you shifted gears in this post. Because you know you are not the person to demand that apology.

There is a great deal of distance between voting for a 3rd party in a deeply red state and enabling nuclear holocaust. Talk about a leap to a conclusion.

And then the glaring assumption that one vote has any sort of affect at all in an American presidential election... I mean to have culpability, you have to have an effect. Nobody's one vote had an effect in that election. Not even a little bit. There is no ethical system anywhere that would place culpability on a voter for any party in this circumstance.

If you really want to go around demanding apologies of people, you should demand apologies from the EC. They were the ones who actually elected Trump. Let us know how many apologies you get.