to make such a meaningless point.  The concept/implication in both cases is that these kids were agents of a liberal-financed master plan to manipulate them.

Nowhere in the whole thread below did anyone say "we agree" to the Soros thing, nor was anyone asked about it. Every counter post I see is either "emotions make bad laws, so we shouldn't let HS students drive policy" or "HS students tend not to be the most emotionally developed people in the world".

Soros support is either a huge assumption about those posters' motives or willfull mischaracterization. Given that you won't actually point people or posts out, I'm guessing the latter.