From some folks' perspective (mine included), those who expand and opacify the administrative state are the truly horrible. They  get approved all the time.

You seem to be a fan of that/those, but that doesn't make your perspective the "correct" one.

of relevant experience.  If horrible doesn’t work, how about criminal, unethical, or just incompetent? I even gave you Devos.

show me another Admin with anything comparable. I assume you Want to defend the rigor of his vetting process too.